Maritime History of the Great Lakes

Marine Review (Cleveland, OH), August 1917, p. 285

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

August, 1917 of the relative THE MARINE REVIEW importance of properly prepar- ing the site is found in the es- timates for’. a small California yard, in which the “Cost -- of buildings is giv- en as $9280 and the yard work at. -816,520, =| ins cluding $4720 for filling. In some PROPERTY LINE ‘ Une. mmm Pacific: ¢600 57 yards where nat- ural conditions are unfavorable, the building ways, framing stages and even the foundations for iin. ' Joreer 1 ' ONOER AG fat 285 tle consideration has been given the influence of the shape of the CRANE Way Borer House property on the y w. DES CRANE WAY fA —— /20° progress of the material through the plant. Many yards, especially some of the Buitoine StiP No.3 CBVLKHEAD 2 HIEH Bv1L DING St1P No2 ground Re Recaps ' bnocr CRANE Way Buitoine Ste Not z € (wousrRiag Rast Foao buildings and lumber storage have been placed on piles. On fresh-water riv- Maz ShéD newer ones, are laid out with no thought what- ever, apparently, to the labor that might be saved by properly and thoughtfully rout- ing the work. The principles of straight - line progress that are so ingrained in the metalworking industries and’ most other pro- os ductive establish- ments, have been Ratt ROAD GRADE 20 Roapway RéstRrviod ! | OF EYCES Ap i lorr ers, safe . fromm the ravages of the toredo, this procedure is not so objectionable as on salt water, but under all circumstances it is subject to crit- icism on account of being tem- porary and a source of continual ex- pense for renewals. This practice can be defended only in cases where the E & BALLIN, S ENGINEERS SOx1CO completely over- looked. The re- FIG. 20—YARD WITH FOUR BUILDING SLIPS COMPACTLY ARRANGED ON CITY: PROPERTY. builder feels his business is so purely transient that the expense of filling-in permanent foundations: or paying enough for a suitable natural site, is unjustified. In many wooden shipyards too lit- sult is chaos and a tremendous waste of money. This comes from the practice of throwing the yards to- gether rather than having them de- signed by a competent, experienced engineer. If routing alone is to be consid- ered, a long, narrow yard, in which FIG. 2iI—A STEEL FRAMED REVOLVING CRANE FOR WOODEN SHIPYARD

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy