Maritime History of the Great Lakes

Marine Review (Cleveland, OH), July 1926, p. 85

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

July, 1926 MARINE REVIEW : re Speier % + ea Boiler room of a New York Central tug showing a | typical Todd Fuel Oil Burning installation ; NEW YORK CENTRAL Marine Department __ SAVES $57.51 PER HOUR oo BY BURNING FUEL O11 : . CAREFUL comparison of fuel consumption was made by the Marine Department of the New York Central R. R. covering the year 1922 (the last year coal was used) and 1925 (the first year their entire fleet was converted to oil burning) with the following result: LBS. OF COAL PER LBS. OF OIL PER TUG H.P. HOUR H.P. HOUR cS 2.69 1.30 B’ 2.51 1.30 e 2.33 1.16 D - 2.51 1.32 E 237.) 1.27 FE. 2.78 1.42 G 2.82 1.40 H 2.64 1.41 ‘amount of dollars and cents saved is: both fuels during 1925, for the entire fleet, the difference in cost per horse- TODD DRY DOCK, ENGINEERING & REPAIR CORPORATION Foot of 23rd Street, Brooklyn, New York Taking the average price prevailing for | power hour was distinctly in favor of fuel oil, as follows: DIFFERENCE IN FAVOR COAL ‘ OIL OF OIL Tug boats $0.009789 $0.006858 $0.002931 Steam lighters 0.011388 0.008856 0.002532 Ferry boats 0.005733 0.004570 0.001163 Applying these figures to the operation of their entire fleet per hour the actual DIFFERENCE IN FAVOR COAL ou OF OIL Tug boats (13064) . $127.88 $89.59 $38.29 Steam lighters (1800) 20.50 15.94 4.56 Ferry boats (12600) 72.24 57.58 14.66 Total saving per hour $57.51 Todd engineers are available at all times" for consultation with owners or operators. Please mention MARINE REVIEW when writing to Advertisers

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy