The 'Canadian Corollary' to the Monroe Doctrine and the Ogdensburg Agreement of 1940

Publication
The Northern Mariner / Le marin du nord (St. John's, NL), Jan 1991
Comments (0)
Be the first to comment on this record.
Add your own comment.
Is it OK to make your name public?
Is it OK to make your comment public?
Making Comments

Comments may be edited for appropriate language and HTML.


All fields are required.


Not all comments will be posted.


Your email address will be stored so that we may contact you again about your comment, but will not be displayed to the public, or otherwise shared, without your permission.


Comments will not be posted until they have been reviewed.


To make a a simple paragraph break, simply hit [Enter] twice

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy




My favourites lets you save items you like, tag them and group them into collections for your own personal use. Viewing "My favourites" will open in a new tab. Login here or start a My favourites account.

thumbnail








The 'Canadian Corollary' to the Monroe Doctrine and the Ogdensburg Agreement of 1940


An understanding or even an alliance [between the United States and Canada] may indeed be necessary for the preservation of that North American civilization which is our joint possession. John W. Dafoe Editor, the Winnipeg Free Press in a lecture at Columbia University, 1934.[1] Very few people in the 1930s could have grasped the significance of John Dafoe's words. Indeed, he would have been surprised to learn of the coming intimacy in Canadian-American relations, not only during World War H but also in the years to follow. He would have been amazed at the wartime understanding which continued into the post-war years, and at the principal forum of that entente, the Permanent Joint Board on Defence (PJBD).